<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Glossary on Hallucination-Free AI</title><link>https://www.hallucination-free.org/glossary/</link><description>Recent content in Glossary on Hallucination-Free AI</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.hallucination-free.org/glossary/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>What is an AI hallucination?</title><link>https://www.hallucination-free.org/glossary/ai-hallucination/</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.hallucination-free.org/glossary/ai-hallucination/</guid><description>How should the term be used? This is our working definition. State the evaluation rule whenever you use it: false factual content and a claim unsupported by a supplied document are related but different findings.
FActScore evaluates support for individual factual claims; the legal-tool reliability paper studies hallucinations in a specific professional setting. Their scopes illustrate why a definition must travel with the metric. FActScore · Legal-tool study.
What is a simple example?</description></item></channel></rss>